The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an cute small “ham sandwich”. Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a big but fiercely protective companion. Another whale, Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and sways like a worm. Lillooet the beluga is the “loving presence” with a heart of gold.
Thirty enclosed beluga whales in a Canada-based entertainment facility have become pawns in a disagreement between a shuttered park, government authorities and advocacy groups.
But those closest to the whales say the impassioned discussion over their destiny often ignores the individual traits of the whales who, after growing up in confinement, have been thoroughly researched by the humans who see them each day.
After the national authorities prevented the sale of the belugas to a foreign facility, the controversial facility near the famous falls where they are held threatened to end their lives unless the federal government covers the cost of keeping them alive. Canada’s fisheries minister has rejected that request, placing the 30 whales in an ever more uncertain position.
Scientists say that belugas’ brain structure, along with their mimicry abilities, cognitive challenges and social skills suggest they are highly cognitive animals – something one caretaker learned first-hand.
Burgess spent several years as a beluga trainer, a job that entailed earning the trust of the marine predators.
“Establishing those connections over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of care. At the outset, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain mutual trust. And they start being more vulnerable with you. It’s just so wonderful and fulfilling.”
Burgess knew the whales were highly intelligent, but she says she was even so astounded by the subtleties and idiosyncrasies in their dispositions. She developed a special affection for a pair of whales with contrasting temperaments.
“Eve accepted me. Cleo made me earn it,” she said. “Both changed the way I understand relationships.”
Burgess’s connection with the whales progressed against a context of increasing societal concern to their captivity.
During her time at the facility, seven belugas and the park’s one killer whale, Kiska, passed away. In total, 19 belugas have perished at the park since 2019, a statistic which the facility links to expected lifespan, but which advocates say points to the inadequate care in which they were housed.
The facility did not open to the visitors over the summer, but Burgess says she witnessed firsthand consequences of the cessation. “Concrete is breaking off from the tanks because they’re falling apart and not being repaired. The whales are exploratory and so they pick it up and move about with pieces in their mouth. It’s distressing to see.”
The facility did not comment to a questionnaire, but in the past asserted: “The whales … get far superior veterinary services and 24/7 attention than any person in the United Kingdom, or anywhere else.”
Burgess was fired from the park in the spring following the death of a beluga, an unwell beluga the employees had to put down. She said the park thought information of the death were leaked to the press and she was released not long after.
The ambiguity over the whales’ future has left her and staff members in anguish. She says the facility’s warning to end the lives of its whales is a negotiation tactic and is a “extremely difficult” endeavor, adding any efforts to humanely kill even a single beluga would require “considerable manpower”, trucks and machinery.
“It’s impossible in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.
She backs requests for the whales to be taken promptly from the facility, with its deteriorating pools and reduced personnel.
In recent months, Canada’s fisheries minister denied a bid to transfer the whales to an overseas location.
“Allowing the proposal would have meant a perpetual situation in enclosure and a reversion to public entertainment,” the official wrote. “As society, we know that belugas belong in the wild, not in pools for our enjoyment. I could not in clear conscience permit an export that would continue the treatment these belugas have endured.”
But the former trainer said the minister’s statements indicate a more general incorrect perception of the facts of life for belugas born in captivity.
“The people needs to realize these are whales that have existed solely in captivity and they will need ongoing assistance for the rest of their years,” she said. “Many just don’t realize that it’s not as simple as saying ‘shut it down’.”
As decision makers work to find a resolution, proposals have emerged, some of which have minimal feasibility. An idea called for the belugas to be let go into the open waters of the Arctic – where whales are a important part of nourishment for Inuit communities.
A suggested sanctuary in the province of Nova Scotia, which has received government approval, has been highly debated. The prospective site, which includes extensive space of protected cove, remains undeveloped. Advocates remain positive that it could eventually represent a permanent resolution for a number of the whales.
But, the former trainer says, among staff she’s discussed with, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “merely an trial” in the whales’ well-being.
Others say the idea of a sanctuary reflects a worldwide trend away from animal displays and could represent a workable solution in the near future.
An official, head of the sanctuary project, said the site will simulate the intellectual stimulation and feeding regimen the whales get from caretakers, albeit in a much larger space. He said after the well-being of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|
A seasoned journalist specializing in UK political analysis with over a decade of experience covering Westminster and international relations.